The curious case of the disappearing jet ski

In early 2018, Edwin’s jet ski stopped working. He took the jet ski to his usual repairer, but they were at capacity, and could not take on the repairs. They recommended another repairer, who was performing repairs part-time, out of his garage. Edwin dropped off his jet ski with this amateur repairer.

Several months later, the repairs still were not complete, and Edwin was becoming worried. After making a few calls and emails and receiving no response, Edwin drove to the repairer’s house. He found the property abandoned, and his jet ski gone.

After filing a police report, Edwin made a claim for the stolen jet ski to his insurer. The insurer declined the claim, saying Edwin’s policy did not cover theft by a person to whom Edwin entrusted his jet ski. The insurer said Edwin had voluntarily given possession of the jet ski to the repairer, so the theft was not covered by his policy.

 

Edwin’s view

Edwin thought the insurer’s interpretation of the policy was unfair. He said that if theft from a repairer was not covered by his policy, then the policy must be much narrower than the policies offered by other insurance companies. He said almost all marine insurance policies covered damage or theft while a vehicle was being repaired.

 

The insurer’s view

The insurer said the policy was clear – Edwin had entrusted his jet ski to the repairer, so the theft was not covered.

Edwin complained to FSCL.

 

Review

We agreed with the insurer’s interpretation of Edwin’s insurance policy. If Edwin gave possession of his jet ski to someone, and that person stole the jet ski, then the theft was not covered by the policy. We found the insurer had acted reasonably when it declined Edwin’s claim.

We also found that the exclusion was not as narrow as Edwin was making out. Edwin had cover if his jet ski was accidentally damaged by a repairer, or if a stranger stole his jet ski from the repairer. The exclusion only applied if the repairer themselves stole Edwin’s vehicle. We did not think this was unfairly broad, or much different to the policies offered by other insurance companies.

 

Outcome

We recommended Edwin discontinue his complaint. Edwin accepted our recommendation, and chose not to take his complaint any further.

 

Key insights for the consumer

No insurance policy covers all risks. It can sometimes feel unfair when you have suffered a loss but are caught out by an exclusion in your policy wording.

FSCL cannot overrule an exclusion outright, but we can investigate whether your insurer has interpreted the exclusion correctly, and whether it has applied the exclusion fairly and reasonably.

Search case studies